The right thing for the wrong reasons: FLOSS doesn't imply security

A recent article discusses the misconception that free and open-source software, or FLOSS, is inherently secure. The article argues that the security of FLOSS is not guaranteed simply because it is open-source. The post has garnered some attention, with a discussion on the topic available on a news forum. The article itself can be found on a personal blog, and comments on the topic are also available on a separate webpage. The discussion has generated a limited number of comments so far. The topic has received a small amount of engagement, with only a few points and comments.