CVE-2026-7188

CRITICAL9.8

Published 2026-09-10 · Source iletisim@usom.gov.tr

Description

Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Armiya Information Technologies Ltd. Co. Access Control System allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Access Control System: before Versiyon 2.

CVSS vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWE-89

References

https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-26-1061

View on NVD

Related CVEs

Same severity, most recent

CVE-2026-8323
URL redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') vulnerability in Armiya Information Technologies Ltd. Co. Access Control System allows Fake the Source of Data. This issue affects Access Control System: before Versiyon 2.
2026-09-10 · score 9.3
CVE-2026-88285
GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 exposes a network-accessible PTZ control service without authentication, allowing remote clients to retrieve PTZ information and issue PTZ or raw serial commands.
2026-09-10 · score 9.4
CVE-2026-88278
GeoVision GV-LPC2211 V1.13 fails to enforce WS-Security UsernameToken freshness or nonce reuse protection, allowing a captured PasswordDigest token to be replayed for subsequent ONVIF operations.
2026-09-10 · score 9.8
CVE-2026-59679
fs_read_glyphs() in the libXfont2 font-server client (src/fc/fserve.c) indexes the per-character encoding[] array using num_chars from the FS_QueryXBitmaps16 reply, but that array was allocated with a size derived from num_extents in the separate FS_QueryXExtents16 reply. The two CARD32 fields are never cross-checked. A malicious or compromised font server can send a small num_extents (e.g. 1) in the extents reply, then a large num_chars (e.g. 100000) in the bitmaps reply. This causes attacker-controlled out-of-bounds heap read and writes.
2026-09-10 · score 9.0
CVE-2026-44950
fs_read_glyphs() in the libXfont2 font-server client (src/fc/fserve.c) copies each glyph's bitmap into a single buffer. Existing checks validates only that the source slice (position, length) lies within the source bitmap buffer. It does not check whether the running destination cursor has exceeded the allocation. A malicious font server can send overlapping source offsets -- for example 1000 glyphs each referencing {position:0, length:64} with nbytes=64. Each individual source range passes the existing validation, but the cumulative writes total 64000 bytes into a 64-byte destination buffer. This is a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content.
2026-09-10 · score 9.0