CVE-2026-53928

UNKNOWN

Published 2026-06-23 · Updated 2026-06-25 · Source security-advisories@github.com

Description

NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user's refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.

CWE-613

References

https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw

View on NVD

Related CVEs

Same severity, most recent

CVE-2026-8720
wc_Blake2bHmacFinal and wc_Blake2sHmacFinal discard the message when the key length exceeds the block size, producing a MAC that is independent of the input. When the supplied key is longer than the BLAKE2 block size the key-hashing branch reinitialized the running hash state, discarding the accumulated message data, so the resulting MAC depended only on the key and not on the message being authenticated. This bug is specific to the HMAC-BLAKE2 APIs that were added in wolfSSL version 5.9.0.
2026-06-25 · score —
CVE-2026-7532
iPAddress name constraints bypass when WOLFSSL_IP_ALT_NAME is not defined. IP address name constraints are not enforced in that configuration, allowing a certificate to bypass an issuing CA's IP address constraints.
2026-06-25 · score —
CVE-2026-7511
PKCS7_verify signer confusion allows forged signatures, where the signer associated with a signature is not correctly bound, permitting a forged signature to be accepted.
2026-06-25 · score —
CVE-2026-6331
HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.
2026-06-25 · score —
CVE-2026-6330
The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection.
2026-06-25 · score —