CVE-2026-110971

UNKNOWN

Published 2026-10-30 · Source cvd@cert.pl

Description

Use of a weak password encoding algorithm in Płatnik software allows a user who obtains encoded password to easily decode it. This issue was fixed in metric 242 in version 10.02.002.

CWE-261

References

View on NVD

Related CVEs

Same severity, most recent

CVE-2026-87768
DateTime::Lite versions before 0.8.1 for Perl allow CPU exhaustion via a per-day loop when adding seconds. _normalize_leap_seconds crosses day boundaries one day at a time, so add(seconds => $n) on an object with a non-floating time zone takes about |$n|/86400 iterations, and nothing limits $n. The XS implementation and the pure-Perl fallback both have the loop. An attacker who controls the number of seconds added can keep the process busy for as long as they choose.
2026-10-30 · score —
CVE-2026-75882
An improper access control vulnerability in ESET Endpoint Encryption and ESET Full Disk Encryption allow attacker with standard user permissions access a device interface belonging to a privileged kernel driver and send specially crafted requests.
2026-10-30 · score —
CVE-2026-64860
Rejected reason: Further research determined the issue is not a vulnerability.
2026-10-30 · score —
CVE-2026-13576
CallBackery versions before 0.62.0 for Perl store user passwords as unsalted HMAC-SHA1 hashes. Passwords are hashed with hmac_sha1_sum() from Mojo::Util with no key, a single fast SHA-1 HMAC. There is no salt, so equal passwords give equal hashes, and no work factor slows down guessing. An attacker who obtains the user table can recover passwords by fast offline guessing.
2026-10-30 · score —
CVE-2026-119038
Business::GoCardless versions before 1.01 for Perl complete redirect flows without checking the session token, letting a leaked redirect flow ID create payments against another customer's mandate. confirm_resource takes no session token from the caller. It reads the redirect flow back from the GoCardless API and completes it with the token from that response, so the check that the flow is completed by the session that started it always passes. It then creates the requested payment or subscription against the flow's mandate. Since version 1.00, a flow that already has a mandate is returned as confirmed without being completed again, so the same ID creates a new payment on every call. A remote attacker who obtains another customer's redirect flow ID can create payments or subscriptions against that customer's mandate.
2026-10-30 · score —